Skip to main content

News

Family History Questions 2

  • 2nd August 2020

We’ve had another couple of questions come in.

Firstly though we want to say that Ancestry.co.uk will continue to be available at home until at least the end of August, so you can continue with your research at home.

My ancestor was in a workhouse we think, do you have records?

We do have some workhouse records, but we don’t have many which provide details about ‘inmates’. Poor Law Unions, which began in 1834, taking over from the Old Poor Law which was parish based, were very good at administration. Although we have lots of Board Minutes and Ledgers, few admission registers or other documents with names are here. They may not have survived, or might be elsewhere and not made their way here. It’s frustrating when the type of documents we want today doesn’t appear to have been kept, but like most records, they were never intended for family and local historians in 2020. Their priority was keeping details of money and decisions, rather than about people.

Check our catalogues and lists to see if we have admission registers for the workhouse you’re interested in.

Worcester Workhouse, Tallow Hill

I think I’ve found my ancestor, but they have a different birthplace from what I know, why would this change?

Personal details such as names, ages and birthplaces, can vary from form to form. There can be large periods of time between different forms being filled in.

Did the person fill it in themselves? They may either forgotten, or if born in a village may vary between putting this or the nearest town. Or they may want to be seen to have been born in a particular place, especially if they thought they may need to apply for Poor Law relief. Even if records weren’t used by multiple organisations people may have thought this was the case and may have wanted to be seen to be local. A tiny number of people may have wanted to put somewhere more exotic, or been embarrassed by their birthplace.

Did someone else fill it in? They may have made a guess, misremembered, or assumed. This may not have been seen as a particularly important piece of information so wouldn’t necessarily make large efforts to check.

Different information from what you expect can be common. Check as much as you can to see what matches, and you may need to make an educated guess. It’s always a fine line between educated guesses and going down a wrong line!

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related news


  • 17th March 2026
New Burdens exhibition is now live!

Our exhibition which summarises some of the records catalogued as part of the New Burdens Project is now live and will be displayed until 31st March 2026. Worcestershire Archive and Archaeology Service secured £73000 in 2022 from The National Archives’ (TNA) New Burdens fund to catalogue and improve access to certain public records under The Public Records...

  • 15th March 2026
Did Your Ancestors Skip the Banns?

Did you know that Worcestershire Marriage Bonds and Allegations are now available to view on Ancestry.co.uk? Covering the years c.1630–1949, these fascinating records offer a valuable window into the lives of past generations. For family historians and genealogists, marriage licence records can reveal details that may not appear in traditional parish registers What Was a...

  • 26th February 2026
And on that farm, they had a…

By January 1886, as reported in the Berrow’s Worcester Journal an extension of Powick Hospital was completed which allowed for a further 210 patients admitted to the hospital, with the capacity of the previous buildings at just over 700 patients. With such a large number of patients and staff to receive daily meals, it is...